AI Ethics Principles & Guidelines
Version 1.0 | 01/06/2025
Netconnect Global INC d/b/a welocity.ai
Our Commitment to Ethical AI
At welocity.ai, we recognize the profound impact that AI-powered recruitment technology has on individuals' careers, organizations' success, and society's progress toward equitable employment. This responsibility guides every aspect of our work as we develop, deploy, and continuously improve our AI-powered video interview platform.
These principles represent our commitment to ethical AI development and deployment. They are living guidelines that evolve with technological advancement, regulatory changes, and societal expectations. We actively collaborate with customers, candidates, ethicists, legal experts, industrial-organizational psychologists, and the broader community to maintain the highest ethical standards.
Core AI Ethical Principles
1. Human-Centered Design
We prioritize human dignity and augment human decision-making
Our AI systems are designed to enhance, not replace, human judgment in hiring decisions
We ensure meaningful human oversight at every critical decision point
We respect candidate dignity by providing transparent, respectful interview experiences
We empower recruiters with insights while preserving their ultimate decision authority
2. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
We actively work to eliminate bias and promote diversity
We implement rigorous bias detection and mitigation techniques throughout our AI lifecycle
We ensure our algorithms do not discriminate based on protected characteristics including race, gender, age, disability status, sexual orientation, or religion
We regularly audit our systems for adverse impact across all demographic groups
We design our assessments to promote diversity and equal opportunity in employment
3. Transparency and Explainability
We provide clear understanding of our AI systems
We clearly communicate when and how AI is being used in the assessment process
We provide explainable results that recruiters can understand and act upon
We offer candidates information about the assessment process and criteria
We maintain detailed documentation of our AI models and their decision logic
4. Privacy and Data Protection
We safeguard personal data with the highest standards
We implement privacy-by-design principles in all our AI systems
We minimize data collection to what is necessary for legitimate assessment purposes
We provide clear consent mechanisms and data subject rights
We ensure secure handling of sensitive data including video recordings and biometric information
We comply with global privacy regulations including GDPR, CCPA, and BIPA
5. Accountability and Governance
We take responsibility for our AI systems' impacts
We maintain clear governance structures for AI development and deployment
We establish accountability mechanisms for AI-related decisions
We provide channels for feedback, concerns, and redress
We conduct regular ethical reviews of our AI practices
6. Scientific Validity and Reliability
We ensure our assessments are scientifically sound
We base our algorithms on established industrial-organizational psychology principles
We validate our assessments against actual job performance metrics
We ensure reliability and consistency in our measurements
We collaborate with IO psychologists and data scientists to maintain scientific rigor
Bias Prevention and Mitigation Framework
Our Multi-Layered Approach
You have several options to control cookies:
Pre-Development Analysis
Diverse and representative training data collection
Stakeholder consultation including diverse perspectives
Ethical impact assessment for new AI features
During Development
Algorithmic fairness constraints built into model training
Regular bias testing across protected characteristics
Feature selection to exclude bias-inducing variables
Cross-functional review by diverse teams
Pre-Deployment Testing
Comprehensive adverse impact analysis
Validation against EEOC Uniform Guidelines
Third-party audits where applicable
Pilot testing with diverse candidate populations
Post-Deployment Monitoring
Continuous monitoring of model performance across demographics
Regular fairness audits and reporting
Feedback loops for improvement
Rapid response protocols for identified issues
Compliance with Legal Standards
We adhere to:
EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978)
EU AI Act requirements for high-risk AI systems
State and local AI bias audit laws (NYC Local Law 144, etc.)
International standards including ISO/IEC 23053 and 23894
AI Model Development Process
Phase 1: Job Analysis and Design
Comprehensive job analysis to identify relevant competencies
Define clear, measurable performance indicators
Design structured interview questions based on IO psychology research
Establish validation criteria for model success
Phase 2: Data Collection and Preparation
Collect diverse, representative training data
Implement data quality controls
Apply privacy-preserving techniques
Create balanced datasets across demographic groups
Phase 3: Model Development
Train initial models using state-of-the-art NLP and computer vision
Focus on job-relevant features (communication skills, not appearance)
Implement fairness constraints during training
Create explainable model architectures
Phase 4: Bias Testing and Mitigation
Conduct comprehensive bias audits
Analyze adverse impact across protected groups
Remove or adjust bias-inducing features
Re-train models with fairness optimization
Validate improvements through testing
Phase 5: Validation and Deployment
Validate predictive validity against job performance
Ensure reliability across different contexts
Conduct final fairness assessments
Deploy with monitoring systems in place
Phase 6: Continuous Improvement
Monitor real-world performance
Collect feedback from users and candidates
Regular re-training with new data
Periodic third-party audits
Update models based on changing job requirements
Specific AI Technologies and Their Ethical Safeguards
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
What we analyze : Content, structure, and relevance of responses
What we don't analyze : Accents, speech patterns that could indicate protected characteristics
Safeguards : Language-agnostic models, dialect-neutral processing
Computer Vision for Video Analysis
What we analyze : Professional communication indicators, engagement
What we explicitly exclude : Race, gender presentation, age indicators, physical appearance
Safeguards : Feature masking, privacy-preserving techniques
Behavioral Assessment
What we measure : Job-relevant competencies and skills
What we avoid : Personality inferences unrelated to job performance
Safeguards : Competency-based frameworks, validation against job outcomes
Candidate Rights and Protections
We ensure candidates have the right to:
Information about AI use in their assessment
Understand the assessment criteria and process
Accommodation for disabilities or special needs
Access their personal data and assessment results (where legally required)
Correction of inaccurate personal information
Human review of AI-based decisions (where applicable)
Opt-out of certain AI processing (subject to employer policies)
File complaints about AI assessment practices
Governance and Oversight
AI Ethics Committee
Quarterly reviews of AI practices and outcomes
Investigation of ethical concerns
Guidance on emerging ethical challenges
Stakeholder engagement and consultation
Team Composition
Chief Technology Officer
Head of Data Science
Industrial-Organizational Psychologists
Legal and Compliance Officers
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion representatives
External ethics advisors
Continuous Education
Regular training on AI ethics for all team members
Participation in industry forums and standards bodies
Collaboration with academic researchers
Engagement with regulatory bodies
Measurement and Reporting
Key Metrics We Track
Fairness Metrics
Demographic parity across groups
Equalized odds and opportunity
Adverse impact ratios
Performance Metrics
Predictive validity coefficients
False positive/negative rates by group
Model accuracy and reliability
Transparency Metrics
Explainability scores
User understanding assessments
Candidate satisfaction ratings
Regular Reporting
Annual AI Ethics Report (public)
Quarterly internal ethics reviews
Customer-specific bias audit reports
Regulatory compliance documentation
Commitment to Continuous Improvement
We recognize that ethical AI is not a destination but an ongoing journey. We commit to:
Staying current with evolving ethical standards and best practices
Listening actively to feedback from all stakeholders
Investing continuously in bias mitigation research and development
Collaborating openly with the broader AI ethics community
Adapting quickly to new challenges and opportunities
Leading by example in the recruitment technology industry
Contact and Feedback
We welcome dialogue about our AI ethics practices:
Email :ethics@welocity.ai
Website : https://welocity.ai/ai-ethics
Phone : +1 (415) XXX-XXXX
Ethics Hotline (Anonymous): https://welocity.ai/ethics-concerns
Mailing Address
AI Ethics Team
Netconnect Global INC
415 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[To be appointed if required]
[Contact details]
References and Standards
Our AI ethics framework is informed by:
IEEE Standards for Ethical AI (P7000 series)
ISO/IEC 23053:2022 Framework for AI systems using ML
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 AI risk management
Partnership on AI Tenets and Best Practices
OECD AI Principles (2019)
EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Asilomar AI Principles
Montreal Declaration for Responsible AI
ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
Last Updated : 01/06/2025
Next Review : [Quarterly]
Document Classification : Public
© 2024 Netconnect Global INC. All rights reserved.